[Bug c++/94845] DWARF function name doesn't match demangled name in base type template parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94845 --- Comment #9 from robert at ocallahan dot org --- That makes sense ... well, except implementing a full C++ parser and reserializer is horrific.

[Bug c++/94845] DWARF function name doesn't match demangled name in base type template parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94845 --- Comment #7 from robert at ocallahan dot org --- So gdb reads DW_AT_name "func", parses it, reserializes it to "func", and uses that?