[Bug fortran/81827] Large compile time with derived-type rrays

2020-05-13 Thread robison at arlut dot utexas.edu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81827 Luke Robison changed: What|Removed |Added CC||robison at arlut dot utexas.edu

[Bug fortran/81827] Large compile time with derived-type rrays

2019-10-15 Thread robison at arlut dot utexas.edu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81827 --- Comment #23 from Luke Robison --- (In reply to Luke Robison from comment #22) > (In reply to Luke Robison from comment #21) > > (1) Changing some or all of the "type(levelNN)" definitions to > > "class(levelNN)" definitions > > (2) Changing

[Bug fortran/81827] Large compile time with derived-type rrays

2019-10-14 Thread robison at arlut dot utexas.edu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81827 --- Comment #22 from Luke Robison --- (In reply to Luke Robison from comment #21) > (1) Changing some or all of the "type(levelNN)" definitions to > "class(levelNN)" definitions > (2) Changing from "allocatable" to "pointer" > Although these

[Bug fortran/81827] Large compile time with derived-type rrays

2019-09-04 Thread robison at arlut dot utexas.edu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81827 --- Comment #21 from Luke Robison --- I was again trying to upgrade our gfortran version and ran into this issue again in gfortran-9.2, but I think I found a workaround this time. Re-reading Paul Thomas' comments and looking at the changes in

[Bug libfortran/89020] close(status='DELETE') does not remove file

2019-01-28 Thread robison at arlut dot utexas.edu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89020 --- Comment #17 from Luke Robison --- (In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #8) > Luke, do you ever build gcc? I applied these patches to 8.2.0 and got the expected error message and iostat of 26. Looks good to me. Thanks.

[Bug libfortran/89020] close(status='DELETE') does not remove file

2019-01-24 Thread robison at arlut dot utexas.edu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89020 --- Comment #4 from Luke Robison --- > First, what virtualbox is doing is a violation of common UNIX > semantics, so we would be within our rights :-) to do this. Agreed. This is definitely outside of the norm for a unix filesystem. I just

[Bug libfortran/89020] New: close(status='DELETE') does not remove file

2019-01-23 Thread robison at arlut dot utexas.edu
: libfortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: robison at arlut dot utexas.edu Target Milestone: --- Version: GNU Fortran (Ubuntu 7.2.0-8ubuntu3.2) 7.2.0 OS: Guest Ubuntu running inside Host Windows 10 using VirtualBox Problem: CLOSE(status='DELETE',iostat=stat

[Bug fortran/81827] Large compile time with derived-type rrays

2018-03-09 Thread robison at arlut dot utexas.edu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81827 Luke Robison changed: What|Removed |Added CC||robison at arlut dot utexas.edu