[Bug middle-end/113205] [14 Regression] internal compiler error: in backward_pass, at tree-vect-slp.cc:5346 since r14-3220

2024-02-08 Thread sergio at serjux dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113205

--- Comment #9 from Sérgio Basto  ---
Thank you it worked , MLT was built successfully on Fedora Rawhide

[Bug middle-end/113205] [14 Regression] internal compiler error: in backward_pass, at tree-vect-slp.cc:5346 since r14-3220

2024-02-07 Thread sergio at serjux dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113205

--- Comment #6 from Sérgio Basto  ---
and any workaround to build mlt on x86_64 ,exist ? 

I tried disable lto, hardening and also disable strict symbols (-Wl,-z,defs )
and still not build neither in koji nor in my machine

[Bug middle-end/113205] [14 Regression] internal compiler error: in backward_pass, at tree-vect-slp.cc:5346 since r14-3220

2024-02-05 Thread sergio at serjux dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113205

Sérgio Basto  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||sergio at serjux dot com

--- Comment #5 from Sérgio Basto  ---
(In reply to Matthias Klose from comment #0)
> seen with trunk 20240101 on x86_64-linux-gnu, building the mlt package. It
> claims to be not reproducible, but always fails to build.

I notice that mlt just fail to build on x86_64
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=112893731

HTH

[Bug c++/84468] [gcc 8] Inconsistent -Wstringop-truncation warnings with -O2

2018-02-19 Thread sergio at serjux dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84468

Sérgio Basto  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||sergio at serjux dot com

--- Comment #1 from Sérgio Basto  ---
btw and this warning  [1] make sense ? 

[1]
mongoose.c: In function 'mg_resolve_async_opt':
mongoose.c:10791:3: error: 'strncpy' specified bound 1024 equals destination
size [-Werror=stringop-truncation]
   strncpy(req->name, name, sizeof(req->name));

[Bug c/69602] [6 Regression] over-ambitious logical-op warning on EAGAIN vs EWOULDBLOCK

2016-03-10 Thread sergio at serjux dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69602

Sérgio Basto  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||sergio at serjux dot com

--- Comment #12 from Sérgio Basto  ---
if EAGAIN and EWOULDBLOCK may be identical, but also that they may be distinct,
this warning doesn't make sense, IMHO, look at this virtualbox solution :

https://www.virtualbox.org/changeset/59960/vbox/trunk 

it is worst than before, just to avoid one warning.

[Bug inline-asm/56148] [4.8 Regression] inline asm matching constraint with different mode

2013-02-21 Thread sergio at serjux dot com

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56148

--- Comment #13 from Sérgio Basto sergio at serjux dot com 2013-02-21 
17:45:53 UTC ---
Hi, it see that was applied on gcc-4.8.0-0.12 

Thanks,


[Bug inline-asm/56148] [4.8 Regression] inline asm matching constraint with different mode

2013-02-12 Thread sergio at serjux dot com

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56148

--- Comment #11 from Sérgio Basto sergio at serjux dot com 2013-02-12 
18:38:06 UTC ---
Vlad, don't wanna rush you , but let me know when we have this patch on gcc of
Fedora rawhide , to continue testing compilation of VirtualBox .
Thanks,


[Bug inline-asm/56148] [4.8 Regression] inline asm matching constraint with different mode

2013-02-04 Thread sergio at serjux dot com

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56148

--- Comment #4 from Sérgio Basto sergio at serjux dot com 2013-02-04 19:46:55 
UTC ---
Created attachment 29351
  -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29351
the questionable code

hi, send in attach the code , (that in think) that is in discussion. To see if
we can fix it , to avoid this compile error  .


[Bug inline-asm/56148] [4.8 Regression] inline asm matching constraint with different mode

2013-02-03 Thread sergio at serjux dot com

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56148

Sérgio Basto sergio at serjux dot com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||sergio at serjux dot com

--- Comment #1 from Sérgio Basto sergio at serjux dot com 2013-02-04 03:06:45 
UTC ---
hi, 
This happens when compile VirtualBox-4.2.6 with gcc-4.8

the code of in question is include/iprt/asm.h line 4167


[Bug inline-asm/56148] [4.8 Regression] inline asm matching constraint with different mode

2013-02-03 Thread sergio at serjux dot com

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56148

--- Comment #2 from Sérgio Basto sergio at serjux dot com 2013-02-04 03:12:35 
UTC ---
Hi again, 
this is not a duplicated bug of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55512 ?


[Bug rtl-optimization/52785] New: Compile with -O fails in gcc 4.7

2012-03-29 Thread sergio at serjux dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52785

 Bug #: 52785
   Summary: Compile with -O fails in gcc 4.7
Classification: Unclassified
   Product: gcc
   Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P3
 Component: rtl-optimization
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: ser...@serjux.com


Hi, 
Though compile C sources shouldn't change behavior when we change -O
(optimization) flag but we see 2 or 3 issues with -O flag.


https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=402285#c2
compiles with -O2 and not with -O3 !? 

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47971

Compile X11-server git version, just compiles with -O0 , not with other -O


[Bug rtl-optimization/52785] Compile with -O fails in gcc 4.7

2012-03-29 Thread sergio at serjux dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52785

--- Comment #1 from Sérgio Basto sergio at serjux dot com 2012-03-30 01:41:12 
UTC ---
Here is the 3rd issue:

http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg/2012-March/054377.html


[Bug rtl-optimization/52785] Compile with -O fails in gcc 4.7

2012-03-29 Thread sergio at serjux dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52785

--- Comment #3 from Sérgio Basto sergio at serjux dot com 2012-03-30 02:13:44 
UTC ---
Created attachment 27041
  -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27041
preprocessed source with -O1

/usr/include/xorg/os.h:496:55: error: expected identifier or ‘(’ before
‘__extension__’

line 496 is:
extern _X_EXPORT char * strndup(const char *str, size_t n);

we have just 3 strndup in teste.i

don't see anything wrong


[Bug rtl-optimization/52785] Compile with -O fails in gcc 4.7

2012-03-29 Thread sergio at serjux dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52785

--- Comment #5 from Sérgio Basto sergio at serjux dot com 2012-03-30 02:39:25 
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
 strndup is a macro in glibc header files.  Use (strndup) to disable the macro
 function.
 
 This is not a GCC bug or a glibc bug (since you supply  _GNU_SOURCE which says
 define this macro) as the header is using something in the GNU_SOURCE
 namespace.

Sorry , could you help me try solve this 
the code is : 

#ifndef HAVE_STRNDUP
extern _X_EXPORT char * strndup(const char *str, size_t n);
#endif

so  -DHAVE_STRNDUP make source compile , what or how I fix the source ?