https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114646
--- Comment #17 from Sunil Pandey ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #10)
> Created attachment 57906 [details]
> A patch
>
> I am testing this.
This patch resolved my static testing issue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88035
--- Comment #3 from Sunil Pandey ---
I added _mm512_reduce_round_pd() and bunch of other missing intrinsic last
year.
commit 93103603fd66a9fcf3ea2d8b52657e4b2496f544
Author: Sunil K Pandey
Date: Wed Oct 14 11:36:39 2020 -0700
x86: Add
-common/struct-elem-5.c
--target_board='unix{-m64}'"
$ cd {build_dir}/x86_64-linux/libgomp/testsuite && make check
RUNTESTFLAGS="c++.exp=libgomp.c-c++-common/struct-elem-5.c
--target_board='unix{-m64\ -march=cascadelake}'"
(Please do not reply to this email, for question about this report, contact me
at skpgkp2 at gmail dot com)
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: skpgkp2 at gmail dot com
CC: crazylht at gmail dot com, hjl.tools at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 49218
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97018
--- Comment #5 from Sunil Pandey ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> Do they PASS on the GCC 10 branch?
GCC 10 branch has same issue. Same patch should be applied to GCC 10 too.
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: regression
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: skpgkp2 at gmail dot com
CC: hjl.tools at gmail dot com
Target Milestone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95237
--- Comment #23 from Sunil Pandey ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #20)
> This bug has prevented the successful compilation of the local
> Linux kernel for just over a month now.
>
> If I can assist with any testing, please let me
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96192
Sunil Pandey changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||skpgkp2 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96192
--- Comment #3 from Sunil Pandey ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> Hmm, but there's no local variable to copy here? Are you refering to the
> result decl from b we materialize in c? This would be the same case
> as for example
: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: skpgkp2 at gmail dot com
CC: hjl.tools at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Target: x86_64-*-* i?86-*-*
tree-inline.c function
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: skpgkp2 at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Target: x86_64-*-* i?86-*-*
LOCAL_DECL_ALIGNMENT Macro documentation
1172 @defmac LOCAL_DECL_ALIGNMENT (@var{decl})
1173 If defined, a C expression
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95237
--- Comment #18 from Sunil Pandey ---
Another test, trigger with -Os option.
$ cat foo.i
int a;
long long b() {}
int c() {
if (b())
a = 1;
}
$gcc -m32 -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -Os -c foo.i
during GIMPLE pass: adjust_alignment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95237
--- Comment #17 from Sunil Pandey ---
$ cat foo.c
long long c(long long x) {}
int a() { long long b = c(b); }
$ gcc -m32 -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -c foo.c
during GIMPLE pass: adjust_alignment
foo.c: In function ??a??:
foo.c:2:5: internal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: skpgkp2 at gmail dot com
CC: hjl.tools at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Long long function parameter should be aligned to 32 bit on x86 target.
$ cat paramtest.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95237
--- Comment #14 from Sunil Pandey ---
Created attachment 48662
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48662=edit
Add target hook to skip alignment check for long long on x86 with -m32 and
-mpreferred-stack-boundary=2
Bootstrap and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95237
--- Comment #4 from Sunil Pandey ---
This test case and many other regression on x86 caused by following change set
r11-508
Good
$
/local/skpandey/gccwork/pr95237/tools-build/gcc-debug-r11-507/release/usr/gcc-11.0.0-x86-64/bin/gcc
-m32
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92807
--- Comment #5 from Sunil Pandey ---
Patch link: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-12/msg00450.html
,
||skpgkp2 at gmail dot com
Summary|gcc generate extra move for |gcc generate extra move for
|the snippet code|the snippet code along with
||lea instruction.
--- Comment #1
: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: skpgkp2 at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91512
--- Comment #20 from Sunil Pandey ---
Created attachment 46851
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46851=edit
Compile time regression reproducer.
attached reproducer show ~28X compile time regression after the commit. See the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91512
--- Comment #18 from Sunil Pandey ---
(In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #17)
> Simply passing on a huge number of arguments is not enough to trigger this.
>
> Here's a perl script to generate test cases:
>
> while ($n=shift)
> {
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91512
--- Comment #16 from Sunil Pandey ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #15)
> On Thu, 22 Aug 2019, skpgkp2 at gmail dot com wrote:
>
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91512
> >
> > --- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91512
--- Comment #14 from Sunil Pandey ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #7)
> (In reply to Sunil Pandey from comment #4)
> > Actually it is spec cpu 2017 521.wrf benchmark getting this problem while
> > compiling. Compilation taking
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91512
--- Comment #4 from Sunil Pandey ---
(In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #3)
> (In reply to Sunil Pandey from comment #2)
>
> > phase opt and generate : 47.72 ( 97%) 0.24 ( 77%) 48.04 (
> > 96%) 118205 kB ( 89%)
>
> So,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91512
--- Comment #2 from Sunil Pandey ---
Before commit time report:
==
$
/local/skpandey/gccwork/gcc_trunk/tools-build/gcc-debug/release.a4ba5c3ec624008e899a8bcb687359db25140c23/usr/gcc-10.0.0-x86-64/bin/gfortran
-m64 -c -o
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: skpgkp2 at gmail dot com
CC: crazylht at gmail dot com, hjl.tools at gmail dot com,
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
We have a big fortran file which used to take 30 second to compile
-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: skpgkp2 at gmail dot com
CC: crazylht at gmail dot com, hjl.tools at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
ICE when compile with gcc option "-O3 -mtune-ctrl=^inter_unit_moves_to_vec
-msse4.1"
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: skpgkp2 at gmail dot com
CC: hjl.tools at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
1 static inline void pixel_avg( uint8_t *dst, int
28 matches
Mail list logo
