[Bug tree-optimization/59124] [6 Regression] Wrong warnings "array subscript is above array bounds"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59124 Szőts Ákos changed: What|Removed |Added CC||szotsaki at gmail dot com --- Comment #48

[Bug c++/95330] New: Unneeded -Wmissing-braces warning when initialising std::array

Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: szotsaki at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Example code: #include int main() { const volatile std::array a = {1, 2, 3}; return 0; } Compile with "-std=c++17 -Wmi

[Bug c/92773] [8/9/10/11 Regression] GCC compilation with big array / header is infinite

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92773 Szőts Ákos changed: What|Removed |Added CC||szotsaki at gmail dot com --- Comment #12

[Bug c++/91706] New: [8/9/10 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected class 'type', have 'exceptional' (error_mark) in equate_type_number_to_die, at dwarf2out.c:5782

: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: szotsaki at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- The following test case causes internal

[Bug driver/91244] gcc-ar prepends --plugin option thus triggers binutils getopt_long bug 13256

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91244 --- Comment #1 from Szőts Ákos --- Ps.: I've just realised that it's possible to unify the loop with the next #else section and have only lines nargv[k + 0] = "--plugin"; nargv[k + 1] = plugin; inside the #if condition, thus removing code

[Bug driver/91244] New: gcc-ar prepends --plugin option thus triggers binutils getopt_long bug 13256

: normal Priority: P3 Component: driver Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: szotsaki at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- "ar" seemingly doesn't accept options after a longopt (in our case "--plugin") which makes i

[Bug bootstrap/67128] Makefile.in, libcc1 and --enable-shared

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67128 Szőts Ákos changed: What|Removed |Added CC||szotsaki at gmail dot com --- Comment #3

[Bug c++/83924] New: ICE: Error reporting routines re-entered with -Wduplicated-branches

Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: szotsaki at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Example code: class GenVectorS {}; template using VectorS = GenVectorS; template void runB(const VectorS<(n > m ? n : m)>)

[Bug tree-optimization/59124] [5/6/7 Regression] Wrong warnings "array subscript is above array bounds"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59124 --- Comment #43 from Szőts Ákos --- Yes, I can agree with this reasoning. However, when you remove either the "while" or the "if" statements, the warning disappears. I don't think they should have any influence on the array_size.

[Bug tree-optimization/59124] [5/6/7 Regression] Wrong warnings "array subscript is above array bounds"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59124 Szőts Ákos changed: What|Removed |Added CC||szotsaki at gmail dot com --- Comment #41