[Bug tree-optimization/18501] [7/8/9/10 Regression] Missing 'used uninitialized' warning (CCP)

2019-09-18 Thread vlad at ispras dot ru
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18501 --- Comment #91 from Vladislav Ivanishin --- > --- Comment #90 from Eric Gallager --- > At Cauldron, Vladislav Ivanishin said in his lightning talk that ISP > RAS has a patch to fix this. Well, I also said that this patch is not meant to go

[Bug c++/91011] g++ -Q --help=warning,c++ outputs from C point of view

2019-06-27 Thread vlad at ispras dot ru
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91011 --- Comment #2 from Vladislav Ivanishin --- I already did some debugging (Adam asked on Stackoverflow prior to opening this PR: https://stackoverflow.com/q/56753102/2104472). Re-posting here what I've found out. For the trunk, the problem is

[Bug c++/91011] g++ -Q --help=warning,c++ outputs from C point of view

2019-06-27 Thread vlad at ispras dot ru
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91011 Vladislav Ivanishin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vlad at ispras dot ru --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/90394] [10 Regression] ICE in is_value_included_in, at tree-ssa-uninit.c:1055

2019-05-09 Thread vlad at ispras dot ru
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90394 --- Comment #6 from Vladislav Ivanishin --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2) > Vlad, likely caused by your change - can you investigate please? Sure, I'll investigate and report back next week (we're on national holidays until

[Bug middle-end/89921] New: The dom pass does not respect size of an 'asm' when duplicating BBs

2019-04-02 Thread vlad at ispras dot ru
Priority: P3 Component: middle-end Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: vlad at ispras dot ru Target Milestone: --- // sizeof-asm-dom.c: #define LARGE_ASM "\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n" \ "\n\n\n\n\n\

[Bug target/87076] -mpcu/-march not propagated through LTO bytecode (ice/segfault if arch flags do not match)

2018-08-24 Thread vlad at ispras dot ru
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87076 --- Comment #4 from Vladislav Ivanishin --- "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" writes: > On x86_64 the actual -march switch isn't serialized but it is decomposed into > individual -mFEATURE switches by the driver which are serialized. > > > The

[Bug lto/87076] New: -mpcu/-march not propagated through LTO bytecode (ice/segfault if arch flags do not match)

2018-08-23 Thread vlad at ispras dot ru
Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: lto Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: vlad at ispras dot ru CC: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- # run.sh: cat << EOF > 1.c typedef int i1 __attribute__((