[Bug tree-optimization/44861] New: internal compiler error: in vectorizable_load, at tree-vect-stmts.c:3812

:3812 Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: wouter dot vermaelen at scarlet dot be http

[Bug c++/44682] New: warning: variable �x� set but not used

Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: wouter dot vermaelen at scarlet dot be http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44682

[Bug c++/42634] New: ICE with -g -O2 -std=c++0x in copy_fn_p, at cp/decl.c:9973

Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: wouter dot vermaelen at scarlet dot be http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42634

[Bug tree-optimization/42462] wrong-code with computed-goto

--- Comment #2 from wouter dot vermaelen at scarlet dot be 2009-12-23 17:21 --- Seems this problem got introduced in revision 152492 (152491 still works, 152492 shows the problem). 2009-10-06 Martin Jambor mjam...@suse.cz PR bootstrap/41395 * opts.c (decode_options

[Bug tree-optimization/42462] New: wrong-code with computed-goto

: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: wouter dot vermaelen at scarlet dot be http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42462

[Bug lto/42401] New: wrong-code with -flto

for this. -- Summary: wrong-code with -flto Product: gcc Version: 4.5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: lto AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: wouter dot

[Bug lto/42402] New: ICE in propagate, at ipa-reference.c:1244

ReportedBy: wouter dot vermaelen at scarlet dot be http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42402

[Bug lto/42320] New: link error with -flto (undefined reference to 'non-virtual thunk ...)

dot org ReportedBy: wouter dot vermaelen at scarlet dot be http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42320

[Bug lto/42009] LTO unable to link in presence of multiple inheritance

--- Comment #2 from wouter dot vermaelen at scarlet dot be 2009-11-11 18:26 --- I (independently) found the same issue today. I managed to reduce it to the following testcase: cat foo.cc struct Base1 { virtual ~Base1(); }; struct Base2 { virtual ~Base2(); }; struct Foo : Base1

[Bug rtl-optimization/40552] New: wrong-code with -fsched2-use-superblocks and exceptions

Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: rtl-optimization AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: wouter dot vermaelen at scarlet dot be http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40552

[Bug tree-optimization/40519] New: ICE with -O2 -ftracer __builtin_unreachable()

ReportedBy: wouter dot vermaelen at scarlet dot be http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40519

[Bug c++/40445] New: g++ void f() { __builtin_unreachable(); }

() { __builtin_unreachable(); } Product: gcc Version: 4.5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: wouter dot vermaelen at scarlet dot be http

[Bug tree-optimization/38104] New: ICE segmentation fault (with -O3 when deref a NULL pointer in the code??)

dot org ReportedBy: wouter dot vermaelen at scarlet dot be http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38104

[Bug middle-end/37174] ICE: in vinfo_for_stmt, at tree-vectorizer.h:546

--- Comment #2 from wouter dot vermaelen at scarlet dot be 2008-08-20 09:38 --- I can trigger the same ICE with this testcase: --- int* getFoo(); struct Bar { Bar(); int* foo1; int* foo2; int* table[4][4

[Bug middle-end/37174] [4.4 Regression] ICE: in vinfo_for_stmt, at tree-vectorizer.h:546

--- Comment #3 from wouter dot vermaelen at scarlet dot be 2008-08-20 10:43 --- I can confirm, SVN revision [EMAIL PROTECTED] is the first one with this bug. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37174

[Bug tree-optimization/36287] New: ICE with -O -ftree-loop-linear

gnu dot org ReportedBy: wouter dot vermaelen at scarlet dot be http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36287

[Bug tree-optimization/36287] ICE with -O -ftree-loop-linear

--- Comment #1 from wouter dot vermaelen at scarlet dot be 2008-05-21 09:06 --- Sorry, compilation line in the previous comment should be g++ -O -ftree-loop-linear bug.ii Bug seems to be introduced in revision 135672: 135671 is still ok 135672 has this bug -- http

[Bug c++/36185] New: wrong code with -O2 -fgcse-sm

Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: wouter dot vermaelen at scarlet dot be http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36185

[Bug c++/36185] [4.4 Regression] wrong code with -O2 -fgcse-sm

--- Comment #2 from wouter dot vermaelen at scarlet dot be 2008-05-09 13:02 --- This bug seems to be introduced in (or triggered by) revision 135053: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - still ok [EMAIL PROTECTED] - generates wrong code -- wouter dot vermaelen at scarlet dot be changed

[Bug tree-optimization/34417] New: simplify '(x A) % B' if 'B A/2'

ReportedBy: wouter dot vermaelen at scarlet dot be http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34417

[Bug c++/33572] New: wrong code with -O

: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: wouter dot vermaelen at scarlet dot be http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33572

[Bug c++/33572] wrong code with -O

--- Comment #3 from wouter dot vermaelen at scarlet dot be 2007-09-27 20:30 --- Created an attachment (id=14257) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14257action=view) preprocessed source (reduced) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33572

[Bug c++/33572] wrong code with -O

--- Comment #4 from wouter dot vermaelen at scarlet dot be 2007-09-27 20:31 --- Created an attachment (id=14258) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14258action=view) assembly output (for reduced bug.ii) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33572

[Bug c++/33340] New: ICE: SSA corruption with -O

Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: wouter dot vermaelen at scarlet dot be http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33340

[Bug tree-optimization/33302] dead-store not eliminated

--- Comment #10 from wouter dot vermaelen at scarlet dot be 2007-09-06 11:48 --- I'm sorry, but can you recheck? The testcase at the top of this bug report still generates the same asm code for me. -- wouter dot vermaelen at scarlet dot be changed: What|Removed

[Bug tree-optimization/33291] [4.3 Regression] a+=2; a+=2 not simplified to a+=4; with -O3 (ok with gcc-4.2.1)

--- Comment #7 from wouter dot vermaelen at scarlet dot be 2007-09-04 12:11 --- Thanks for looking into this so quickly! I confirm the problem is solved for the reduced testcase. However in my original code the dead-store is not eliminated. Do you want me to file a separate bug report

[Bug tree-optimization/33302] New: follow-up on bug 33291 dead-store not eliminated

not eliminated Product: gcc Version: 4.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: wouter dot vermaelen at scarlet dot be http

[Bug tree-optimization/33291] New: a+=2; a+=2 not simplified to a+=4; with -O3 (ok with gcc-4.2.1)

with gcc-4.2.1) Product: gcc Version: 4.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: wouter dot vermaelen

[Bug rtl-optimization/32300] [4.3 Regression] ICE with -O2 -fsee

--- Comment #9 from wouter dot vermaelen at scarlet dot be 2007-08-17 12:44 --- Here is a simpler testcase: int f(int i) { return 100LL / (1 + i); } -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32300

[Bug middle-end/32777] wrong-code with -O -ftracer

--- Comment #1 from wouter dot vermaelen at scarlet dot be 2007-07-17 16:57 --- Problem went away in SVN revision 126700. I tried these revisions: 126536 OK 126568 OK 126572 OK 126573-126586 failed to build gcc 126587 WRONG 126600 WRONG 126664 WRONG 126680 WRONG 126688 WRONG 126696

[Bug c++/32777] New: wrong-code with -O -ftracer

Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: wouter dot vermaelen at scarlet dot be http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32777

[Bug c++/32648] New: missed-optimization: bit-manipulation via bool's

Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: wouter dot vermaelen at scarlet dot be http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32648

[Bug c++/32492] New: attribute always_inline - sorry, unimplemented: recursive inlining

++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: wouter dot vermaelen at scarlet dot be http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32492

[Bug c++/32300] New: ICE with -O2 -fsee

++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: wouter dot vermaelen at scarlet dot be http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32300

[Bug c++/32304] New: ICE in set_mem_attributes_minus_bitpos

Product: gcc Version: 4.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: wouter dot vermaelen at scarlet dot be http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla

[Bug c++/32305] New: ICE in initialize_flags_in_bb with -O -fipa-pta

ReportedBy: wouter dot vermaelen at scarlet dot be http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32305

[Bug libstdc++/32233] New: warning in stl_vector.h:832

Product: gcc Version: 4.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: wouter dot vermaelen at scarlet dot be http://gcc.gnu.org