[Bug c++/53294] Optimize out some exception code

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53294

Andrew Pinski  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
   See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
   ||a/show_bug.cgi?id=38658
 Status|NEW |RESOLVED

--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski  ---
Dup of bug 38658.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 38658 ***

[Bug c++/53294] Optimize out some exception code

[msebor at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53294

Martin Sebor  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||federico.kircheis at gmail dot 
com

--- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor  ---
*** Bug 90029 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c++/53294] Optimize out some exception code

[antoshkka at gmail dot com]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53294

--- Comment #3 from Antony Polukhin  ---
Any progress?

[Bug c++/53294] Optimize out some exception code

[antoshkka at gmail dot com]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53294

--- Comment #2 from Antony Polukhin  ---
*** Bug 82504 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c++/53294] Optimize out some exception code

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53294

Richard Guenther  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
   Last reconfirmed||2012-05-09
 Ever Confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther  2012-05-09 
13:55:37 UTC ---
Certainly interesting.  We lower things too early into __cxa calls though
(I think) to make this work easily.

Consider cases like

struct X { int i; };

int foo (void)
{
  try {
X x;
x.i = 5;
throw x;
  } catch (X& x) {
  return x.i;
  } catch (...) {
   return 0;
   }
}