https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39170
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||in-gcc at baka dot org
--- Comment #22
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39170
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39170
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #20 from Eric
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39170
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39170
--- Comment #18 from Florin Iucha ---
Even this version creates a warning:
#include
struct foo
{
unsigned bar: 30;
unsigned fill: 2;
};
struct foo test(uint32_t value)
{
struct foo foo;
foo.bar = (value >> 2) & 0x3fffU;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39170
Florin Iucha changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||florin.iucha at amd dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39170
Albi changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||albrecht.guendel at web dot de
--- Comment #16
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39170
Eric Gallager egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egall at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39170
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39170
--- Comment #12 from Tom Geocaris tom at atoptech dot com 2013-01-04 17:32:22
UTC ---
Is there any resolution to this issue? We need to move to a more recent version
of gcc, but are still stuck at gcc 4.2.4.
I looked at gcc 4.7.2 but
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39170
--- Comment #13 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-04
17:53:00 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #12)
Is there any resolution to this issue? We need to move to a more recent
version
of gcc, but are still stuck at gcc 4.2.4.
--- Comment #11 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-06 12:18 ---
(In reply to comment #10)
However, with so many lines of legacy code out there using bit-filed that have
been proven to work, it doesn't make sense to revisit/modify them. Would it
be
possible for gcc to provide
12 matches
Mail list logo
