http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56112
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-28
23:07:59 UTC ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Jan 28 23:07:35 2013
New Revision: 195520
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195520
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56112
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56112
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2013-01-27
08:12:41 UTC ---
Or what about something like the attached (very lightly tested)?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56112
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2013-01-27
08:13:43 UTC ---
Created attachment 29284
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29284
draft
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56112
--- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2013-01-27
08:35:37 UTC ---
Uhhmm, I wasn't considering the fact that the testcases added for 53339 are now
xfailed?!? So what? If that's the case (for now at least) we could
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56112
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-27
16:25:36 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
Uhhmm, I wasn't considering the fact that the testcases added for 53339 are
now
xfailed?!?
That was me:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56112
--- Comment #7 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2013-01-27
17:18:03 UTC ---
Good, good, thanks for handling this.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56112
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56112
--- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2013-01-27
07:15:39 UTC ---
Bother. Now it's annoying to go back to the various options (some aren't even
discussed in Bugzilla entries). Maybe you did a bit of that already
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56112
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2013-01-27
07:32:59 UTC ---
I guess we could have in __detail the specialization that submitter proposed to
add to stl_function.h as primary.
10 matches
Mail list logo