https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90638
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely ---
As a workaround for C++03, you can either change the type of lp1 and lp2 to
double, or cast them when used:
std::cout<<' '<&, int) overload being used.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90638
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90638
--- Comment #8 from Igor Smirnov ---
Let me add corrections to my previous post.
1. It needs to add (long double) before M_PI / LONG_MAX in the line
long double phid = M_PI / LONG_MAX;
in the above example. But the result is not changed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90638
--- Comment #7 from Igor Smirnov ---
There can be still problems with big integer powers of complex numbers in the
latest versions.
I just don't see a single correct answer.
As above the expected correct responses are marked by "should be" and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90638
--- Comment #6 from Igor Smirnov ---
Mark, thank you for useful advice.
So, my conclusion is that the rules for resolution in the presence of
function templates are not changed in gcc. For all versions of C++
the result generated by this site
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90638
--- Comment #5 from Marc Glisse ---
Igor, there are free websites that let you check it for yourself very easily,
for instance https://wandbox.org/ , you can test many versions of the compiler
online there.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90638
--- Comment #4 from Igor Smirnov ---
Richard, thanks for checks.
Yes this is correct result.
I am wondering, do they correct this problem for complex<> and for inbuilt
types only?
Is there a possibility for you to run the following program on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90638
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
GCC 7, 8 and 9 for me output
(1,1.46292e-09)
2147483647 2147483648
(-1,7.77156e-16) (-1,-1.46292e-09)
(1.55377,0.643594)
(1.55377,0.643594) (1.55377,0.643594) (1.55377,0.643594)
(1.55377,0.643594)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90638
--- Comment #2 from Igor Smirnov ---
Strange... It came with freshiest available CentOS 7.6.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90638
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
10 matches
Mail list logo
