[Bug middle-end/91725] 275587[10 Regression] ICE in get_nonzero_bits starting with r275587

2019-09-10 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91725 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 46866 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46866=edit gcc10-pr91725.patch Yet another untested patch, tree_nonzero_bits is something that already does what you write

[Bug middle-end/91725] 275587[10 Regression] ICE in get_nonzero_bits starting with r275587

2019-09-10 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91725 --- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1) > gcc10-pr91725.patch An alternative (I don't claim it is better) would be to make get_nonzero_bits conservatively return -1 on unknown input, like the comment

[Bug middle-end/91725] 275587[10 Regression] ICE in get_nonzero_bits starting with r275587

2019-09-10 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91725 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 46864 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46864=edit gcc10-pr91725.patch Untested fix.

[Bug middle-end/91725] 275587[10 Regression] ICE in get_nonzero_bits starting with r275587

2019-09-10 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91725 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|