https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88917
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.3 |8.4
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88917
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|jakub at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88917
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Other option is to spend a lot of energy on this. output_indirect_thunk would
need to be told if it is emitted inside of normal functions or in the magic
functions where it currently does the right thing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88917
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #3)
> Isn't -fasynchronous-unwind-tables part of the GNU/Linux ABI and enabled by
> default? Without it, asynchronous cancellation does not work.
Yes, but nobody is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88917
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88917
Florian Weimer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88917
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fw at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88917
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
