https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93737
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-09-05
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93737
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
On GIMPLE we're more into canonicalization which means we avoid this kind of
expansion and thus at the moment limit it to single load/store cases. But
in principle we could apply the same costing as we
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93737
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor ---
I was thinking for small N, the middle-end could make it work by emitting
copies of the sequences using MEM_REFs, along these lines:
char _2[N - 2];
_2 = MEM [(char * {ref-all}) + 1];
MEM [(char *
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93737
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Sdee the thread starting at:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-09/msg01618.html
Continued at:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-10/msg00277.html
This infastructure patch was committed October 2,
