[Bug tree-optimization/71408] [7 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71408 kugan at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/71408] [7 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71408 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/71408] [7 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71408 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- So fixed?

[Bug tree-optimization/71408] [7 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71408 --- Comment #5 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kugan Date: Mon Jun 6 23:46:11 2016 New Revision: 237158 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237158=gcc=rev Log: gcc/ChangeLog: 2016-06-07 Kugan Vivekanandarajah

[Bug tree-optimization/71408] [7 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71408 --- Comment #4 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org --- Patch posted for review at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-06/msg00330.html

[Bug tree-optimization/71408] [7 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71408 --- Comment #3 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org --- Looking into it. Looks like zero_one_operation is still broken.

[Bug tree-optimization/71408] [7 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71408 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|