https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69883
--- Comment #4 from Bernd Edlinger ---
(In reply to char...@adacore.com from comment #3)
> > I could understand that I can not build something form 1992 with todays
> > tools, but what I do not understand conceptionally, why the host compiler
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69883
--- Comment #3 from charlet at adacore dot com ---
> I could understand that I can not build something form 1992 with todays
> tools, but what I do not understand conceptionally, why the host compiler
> seems to link with the target compiler's
> I could understand that I can not build something form 1992 with todays
> tools, but what I do not understand conceptionally, why the host compiler
> seems to link with the target compiler's runtime, would it work as a
> cross build then?
No, for a cross build you need an identical native
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69883
--- Comment #2 from Bernd Edlinger ---
(In reply to Arnaud Charlet from comment #1)
> You must use an older (or equal) version of GNAT to build GNAT, using a more
> recent version won't work in general, as shown by this PR, and isn't
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69883
Arnaud Charlet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
