https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110172
Florian Weimer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fw at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110172
--- Comment #4 from Xi Ruoyao ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #3)
> I mentioned that on IRC. I'm not sure glibc can even handle exceptions from
> those functions. Is that supported at all? Does printf clean up its own
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110172
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I mentioned that on IRC. I'm not sure glibc can even handle exceptions from
those functions. Is that supported at all? Does printf clean up its own
allocations and locks in that case? IMHO it should be UB
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110172
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110172
--- Comment #1 from David Malcolm ---
Quoting:
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Code-Gen-Options.html#index-fexceptions
"""
-fexceptions
Enable exception handling. Generates extra code needed to propagate
exceptions. For some targets,
