[Bug bootstrap/18252] if the last fn in lib2funcs is implemented in lib1asmfuncs, configuration can fail

2009-07-11 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-11 21:37 --- Likely fixed. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug bootstrap/18252] if the last fn in lib2funcs is implemented in lib1asmfuncs, configuration can fail

2008-12-28 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-28 21:15 --- mklibgcc.in has since been removed in 4.3.x, is this still an issue in 4.3? -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug bootstrap/18252] if the last fn in lib2funcs is implemented in lib1asmfuncs, configuration can fail

2005-07-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added Keywords||build http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18252

[Bug bootstrap/18252] if the last fn in lib2funcs is implemented in lib1asmfuncs, configuration can fail

2004-10-31 Thread oyvind dot harboe at zylin dot com
--- Additional Comments From oyvind dot harboe at zylin dot com 2004-10-31 14:06 --- Created an attachment (id=7442) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7442action=view) Fixes problem This problem definitely exists under CygWin, but I have not checked under e.g. Linux.

[Bug bootstrap/18252] if the last fn in lib2funcs is implemented in lib1asmfuncs, configuration can fail

2004-10-31 Thread oyvind dot harboe at zylin dot com
--- Additional Comments From oyvind dot harboe at zylin dot com 2004-10-31 14:08 --- Created an attachment (id=7443) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7443action=view) test script I used to debug the problem -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18252

[Bug bootstrap/18252] if the last fn in lib2funcs is implemented in lib1asmfuncs, configuration can fail

2004-10-31 Thread oyvind dot harboe at zylin dot com
--- Additional Comments From oyvind dot harboe at zylin dot com 2004-10-31 14:10 --- I ran the test script under Linux, and the problem exists there as well. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18252