--- Comment #34 from drow at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-14 14:53 ---
Subject: Bug 37923
Author: drow
Date: Fri Nov 14 14:51:38 2008
New Revision: 141859
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=141859
Log:
PR bootstrap/38014
PR bootstrap/37923
--- Comment #35 from drow at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-14 15:38 ---
Patches reverted. This is really a bug in gmp/mpfr/intl, but no point
triggering it.
--
drow at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #33 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2008-10-31 06:52 ---
Since the problem is that libintl.h can't be found
No, the problem is that INCINTL is not set correctly.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37923
--- Comment #30 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-30 21:04
---
i686-apple-darwin is still a primary target, so P1.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #31 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-30 22:18
---
This really happens on all targets.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #32 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2008-10-30
22:47 ---
Since the problem is that libintl.h can't be found, shouldn't we have a
toplevel check for libintl and a configure option to set the directory with
--with-libintl=%p or such? The INCL_LIBINTL set in the
--- Comment #24 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2008-10-28
16:21 ---
I still don't understand how the stage1 build of libcpp manages to ignore the
CFLAGS setting in the libccp level Makefile. This would suggest that the stage
1
build of libcpp is entirely handled by the
--- Comment #25 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2008-10-28 16:28 ---
Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression] CPPFLAGS now unset for
stage 1 build of libcpp files.
You do know that A=B in the command line overrides A=C in the makefile
right? :-)
Does the patch work?
--
--- Comment #26 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2008-10-28
16:34 ---
No, I said earlier that the proposed patch doesn't work. Note that INCINTL
doesn't even appear in either the toplevel Makefile or the Makefile in intl
with your patch. It does appear in the libcpp
--- Comment #27 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2008-10-28 16:39 ---
Ah, I missed that. But yes, only libcpp/Makefile is supposed to have INCINTL.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37923
--- Comment #28 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2008-10-28
16:55 ---
Doh, it may be an issue with the fink packaging system. They have a command...
NoSetCPPFLAGS: True
which I assumed was unsetting CPPFLAGS within fink but it very well may
be just setting CPPFLAGS to a
--- Comment #29 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2008-10-28
23:37 ---
I have verified that the fink build system wasn't in fact setting CPPFLAGS to
null
or anything else. So this problem is real when CPPFLAGS doesn't exist,
--
--- Comment #13 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2008-10-27
13:34 ---
Created an attachment (id=16566)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16566action=view)
diff between toplevel Makefiles before and after drow's changes
--
--- Comment #14 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2008-10-27
13:35 ---
Created an attachment (id=16567)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16567action=view)
diff between libcpp Makefiles before and after drow's changes
--
--- Comment #15 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2008-10-27
13:39 ---
Looking at diffs (attached) between the Makefiles in the toplevel and libcpp
subdirectory before and after drow's changes, I don't see any significant
differences in the libcpp level Makefile. However I
--- Comment #16 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2008-10-27
13:44 ---
I must admit I am still baffled at why the current gcc trunk code doesn't honor
the setting of CPPFLAGS=-I/sw/include in the libcpp level Makefile. Is that
Makefile not really used in the stage 1
--- Comment #17 from drow at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-27 13:55 ---
Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression] CPPFLAGS now unset for
stage 1 build of libcpp files.
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 03:37:27AM -, howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot
edu wrote:
already. I think the issue is
--- Comment #18 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2008-10-27
14:03 ---
Do you want to see a different config.log? Should I try to run configure at the
top level in a more verbose mode? I'm not sure how to discover where CPPFLAGS
is being set for the config.log and Makefile
--- Comment #19 from drow at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-27 14:13 ---
It won't be logged.
Paolo, any comment on the CPPFLAGS problem from comment 17? I want the top
level CPPFLAGS passed down, because that's how users can add additional -I
arguments. But it seems typical to do
--- Comment #20 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2008-10-27 14:49 ---
I checked config and I see:
- acinclude.m4 CYG_AC_PATH_SIM sets CPPFLAGS, not a problem in this case
- tcl.m4 is not a problem like acinclude.m4 is not
- gettext.m4 saves CPPFLAGS and restores it
- iconv.m4 does the same
--- Comment #21 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2008-10-27
15:04 ---
Sorry about the Makefile diffs. The 20081016 build tree had completely
bootstrapped whereas the 20081026 build tree had hung on a missing libintl.h
header in the stage 1 build of libcpp. I'll try the
--- Comment #22 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2008-10-27
23:32 ---
The small patch in comment 20 doesn't help. The build still fails at the same
place. I also noticed that with or without the patch I have...
CPPFLAGS = -I/sw/include
set in the intl/Makefile. Also, I
--- Comment #23 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2008-10-27
23:53 ---
Just to be clear, I did do...
cd intl
autoconf -I . -I .. -I ../config
after applying the patch.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37923
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
Summary|CPPFLAGS now unset for stage|[4.4
--- Comment #10 from drow at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-27 02:45 ---
Do you have:
2008-10-24 Daniel Jacobowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Makefile.tpl (HOST_EXPORTS): Correct CPPFLAGS typo.
* Makefile.in: Regenerated.
What was previously setting CPPFLAGS? I don't see
--- Comment #11 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2008-10-27
03:37 ---
I have...
2008-10-24 Daniel Jacobowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Makefile.tpl (HOST_EXPORTS): Correct CPPFLAGS typo.
* Makefile.in: Regenerated.
already. I think the issue is that while
--- Comment #12 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2008-10-27
03:45 ---
I notice that both config.log from the libcpp subdirectory before and after
your change have...
ac_cv_env_CPPFLAGS_set=set
ac_cv_env_CPPFLAGS_value=
which is followed by the occurance of...
27 matches
Mail list logo
