http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46018
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46018
--- Comment #17 from Art Haas ahaas at airmail dot net 2010-11-04 12:52:11
UTC ---
My build from this morning succeeded, so reverting the patch from several weeks
ago has resolved the bootstrap error:
$ gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46018
--- Comment #14 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-03 13:11:19
UTC ---
Created attachment 22250
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22250
preprocessed insn-recog.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46018
--- Comment #15 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-03 13:12:51
UTC ---
After the fix for PR tree-optimization/46286 went in, I'm seeing this ICE, too:
Running
$ cc1 -fpreprocessed insn-recog.i -quiet -dumpbase insn-recog.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46018
--- Comment #16 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2010-11-03 17:09:36
UTC ---
Please try revision 166259.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46018
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46018
--- Comment #12 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2010-10-30 13:59:08
UTC ---
Please try:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-10/msg02569.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46018
--- Comment #13 from Art Haas ahaas at airmail dot net 2010-10-30 17:55:24
UTC ---
The patch listed here did not help:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-10/msg02569.html
The boostrap build still fails:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46018
--- Comment #11 from Art Haas ahaas at airmail dot net 2010-10-26 14:40:04
UTC ---
I ended up trying the version posted in a follow-up mail:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-10/msg02065.html
The bootstrap still failed.
I've now got
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46018
--- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2010-10-21 18:42:22
UTC ---
Can you try
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-10/msg01858.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46018
--- Comment #7 from Art Haas ahaas at airmail dot net 2010-10-18 15:03:56 UTC
---
My bootstrap build succeeded for the this morning again, so I suggest closing
this ticket.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46018
--- Comment #8 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot
com 2010-10-18 15:37:04 UTC ---
On Sun, 17 Oct 2010, ahaas at airmail dot net wrote:
Running 'git bisect' but interpreting a failed build as 'good' and a
successful
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46018
--- Comment #9 from Art Haas ahaas at airmail dot net 2010-10-18 21:27:59 UTC
---
Once the patch discussed in the following mail was applied:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-10/msg01538.html
I can confirm that the bootstrap failure I've
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46018
--- Comment #6 from Art Haas ahaas at airmail dot net 2010-10-17 15:45:40 UTC
---
Running 'git bisect' but interpreting a failed build as 'good' and a successful
build as 'bad' leads to this commit which restored the build:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46018
--- Comment #5 from Art Haas ahaas at airmail dot net 2010-10-16 19:15:51 UTC
---
This morning's build succeeded:
$ gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46018
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46018
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46018
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2010-10-14 15:57:52
UTC ---
Please also show the full options passed to cc1.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46018
--- Comment #3 from Art Haas ahaas at airmail dot net 2010-10-14 20:10:55 UTC
---
Here's the compile command output with the '-v -save-temps' options added:
Reading specs from /export/home/arth/gnu/gcc-1014/./prev-gcc/specs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46018
--- Comment #4 from Art Haas ahaas at airmail dot net 2010-10-14 20:13:45 UTC
---
Created attachment 22044
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22044
Pre-processed 'lto-lang.c' file
The pre-processed 'lto-lang.c' output has been
20 matches
Mail list logo
