http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50857
--- Comment #4 from Michael Matz matz at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-03 17:17:11
UTC ---
Author: matz
Date: Thu Nov 3 17:17:07 2011
New Revision: 180833
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=180833
Log:
libcpp/
PR bootstrap/50857
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50857
Michael Matz matz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50857
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-28
13:08:10 UTC ---
Hm, well - I would rather unconditionally enable those options for stage2 and
3 (we know it'll be G++ at built) and leave them off for stage1. Any way
to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50857
--- Comment #3 from iant at google dot com iant at google dot com 2011-10-28
13:56:23 UTC ---
I suppose you could drop something into POSTSTAGE1_FLAGS_TO_PASS. But
it's not the right thing to do. We want to use -fno-exceptions
-fno-rtti even
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50857
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50857
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50857
Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ian at airs dot com
