[Bug bootstrap/52041] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 183650 with --enable-checking=release

2012-01-31 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52041 --- Comment #19 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-31 08:06:38 UTC --- x86-64-darwin10 @ r183725 bootstrapped with comment #17 #18 applied (and fails repeatably without). testing under way - do you want any more/different

[Bug bootstrap/52041] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 183650 with --enable-checking=release

2012-01-31 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52041 --- Comment #20 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-31 08:41:53 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Jan 31 08:41:46 2012 New Revision: 183751 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=183751 Log: PR bootstrap/52041

[Bug bootstrap/52041] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 183650 with --enable-checking=release

2012-01-31 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52041 --- Comment #21 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-31 09:53:42 UTC --- (In reply to comment #18) Created attachment 26522 [details] X450 And ipa-prop doesn't seem to initialize ao.volatile_p. I think it is a bad idea

[Bug bootstrap/52041] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 183650 with --enable-checking=release

2012-01-31 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52041 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug bootstrap/52041] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 183650 with --enable-checking=release

2012-01-31 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52041 --- Comment #22 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-31 10:06:55 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Jan 31 10:06:50 2012 New Revision: 183753 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=183753 Log: PR bootstrap/52041

[Bug bootstrap/52041] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 183650 with --enable-checking=release

2012-01-30 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52041 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0 ---

[Bug bootstrap/52041] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 183650 with --enable-checking=release

2012-01-30 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52041 --- Comment #5 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-30 13:47:06 UTC --- I just bootstrapped r183695 (incl. Ada and Obj-C++) with --enable-checking=release on i686-darwin9, using gcc4.6 as the bootstrap compiler. What bootstrap

[Bug bootstrap/52041] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 183650 with --enable-checking=release

2012-01-30 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52041 --- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-01-30 14:16:37 UTC --- I just bootstrapped r183695 (incl. Ada and Obj-C++) with --enable-checking=release on i686-darwin9, using gcc4.6 as the bootstrap compiler. What

[Bug bootstrap/52041] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 183650 with --enable-checking=release

2012-01-30 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52041 Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug bootstrap/52041] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 183650 with --enable-checking=release

2012-01-30 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52041 --- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-01-30 15:44:27 UTC --- @r183725 x86-64-darwin10, I see a compare fail on tree-ssa-strlen.o It just finished to bootstrap for me with '--enable-checking=release': [macbook]

[Bug bootstrap/52041] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 183650 with --enable-checking=release

2012-01-30 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52041 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug bootstrap/52041] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 183650 with --enable-checking=release

2012-01-30 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52041 --- Comment #10 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-30 18:22:12 UTC --- the stage3 tree-ssa-strlen.o fails with -fcompare-debug failure (length). An incomplete analysis ... run out of time... The first mismatched tree dump is

[Bug bootstrap/52041] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 183650 with --enable-checking=release

2012-01-30 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52041 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-30 19:26:10 UTC --- The addition of # DEBUG lines in the dumps as well as some changes in D. numbers are expected and correct in between the dumps, but the SSA_NAME versions

[Bug bootstrap/52041] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 183650 with --enable-checking=release

2012-01-30 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52041 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-30 19:36:33 UTC --- Can't reproduce the -fcompare-debug failure with a cross from x86_64-linux to x86_64-darwin on the provided tree-ssa-strlen.i btw., though of course the

[Bug bootstrap/52041] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 183650 with --enable-checking=release

2012-01-30 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52041 --- Comment #13 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-30 20:31:11 UTC --- OK. I've been using the command lines from my build log, with modification to the path to account for the stage2/stage3 ... so like in stage2-gcc/

[Bug bootstrap/52041] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 183650 with --enable-checking=release

2012-01-30 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52041 --- Comment #14 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-30 20:34:08 UTC --- (In reply to comment #13) OK. I've been using the command lines from my build log, with modification to the path to account for the stage2/stage3 ... so like

[Bug bootstrap/52041] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 183650 with --enable-checking=release

2012-01-30 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52041 --- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-30 21:07:57 UTC --- Can you please mail me (or upload somewhere) all the RTL logs from compilation with -fcompare-debug and -fdump-tree-optimized (both the non-gk and gk dumps)?

[Bug bootstrap/52041] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 183650 with --enable-checking=release

2012-01-30 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52041 --- Comment #16 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-30 21:24:07 UTC --- (In reply to comment #15) Can you please mail me (or upload somewhere) all the RTL logs from compilation with -fcompare-debug and -fdump-tree-optimized (both

[Bug bootstrap/52041] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 183650 with --enable-checking=release

2012-01-30 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52041 --- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-30 22:12:24 UTC --- Created attachment 26521 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26521 X449 The cross-compiler under valgrind actually shows some errors, I'm

[Bug bootstrap/52041] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 183650 with --enable-checking=release

2012-01-30 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52041 --- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-30 22:13:44 UTC --- Created attachment 26522 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26522 X450 And ipa-prop doesn't seem to initialize ao.volatile_p. I think it is

[Bug bootstrap/52041] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 183650 with --enable-checking=release

2012-01-29 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52041 --- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-01-29 14:36:29 UTC --- Created attachment 26501 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26501 Assembler for gcc/tree-ssa-strlen.c at stage 2 Assembler generated

[Bug bootstrap/52041] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 183650 with --enable-checking=release

2012-01-29 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52041 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-01-29 14:42:13 UTC --- Created attachment 26502 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26502 bzipped assembler for gcc/tree-ssa-strlen.c at stage 3 Assembler

[Bug bootstrap/52041] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 183650 with --enable-checking=release

2012-01-29 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52041 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-01-29 14:44:55 UTC --- Created attachment 26503 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26503 bzipped preprocessed file for gcc/tree-ssa-strlen.c at stage 3