[Bug bootstrap/58368] [4.9 regression] bootstrap comparison failure in expr.o and i386.o on x86_64-linux

2013-09-16 Thread mikpe at it dot uu.se
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58368 Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug bootstrap/58368] [4.9 regression] bootstrap comparison failure in expr.o and i386.o on x86_64-linux

2013-09-16 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58368 --- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org --- r202345 has been reverted.

[Bug bootstrap/58368] [4.9 regression] bootstrap comparison failure in expr.o and i386.o on x86_64-linux

2013-09-09 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58368 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Possibly related to PR58340?

[Bug bootstrap/58368] [4.9 regression] bootstrap comparison failure in expr.o and i386.o on x86_64-linux

2013-09-09 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58368 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0

[Bug bootstrap/58368] [4.9 regression] bootstrap comparison failure in expr.o and i386.o on x86_64-linux

2013-09-09 Thread mikpe at it dot uu.se
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58368 --- Comment #2 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se --- Applying r202379 didn't fix the comparison failure, but reverting r202345 did.