[Bug bootstrap/71435] [7 regression] sparc bootstrap failure since r235625

2016-06-18 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71435 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/71435] [7 regression] sparc bootstrap failure since r235625

2016-06-18 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71435 --- Comment #13 from Eric Botcazou --- Author: ebotcazou Date: Sat Jun 18 11:10:10 2016 New Revision: 237571 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237571=gcc=rev Log: PR bootstrap/71435 * reload1.c (reload): Pass 0 to

[Bug bootstrap/71435] [7 regression] sparc bootstrap failure since r235625

2016-06-17 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71435 --- Comment #12 from Eric Botcazou --- > The tentative fix restored bootstrap on sparc-linux. Test results look > OK-ish. Thanks, I'll post it tomorrow morning.

[Bug bootstrap/71435] [7 regression] sparc bootstrap failure since r235625

2016-06-17 Thread mikpelinux at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71435 --- Comment #11 from Mikael Pettersson --- (In reply to Mikael Pettersson from comment #10) > (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #9) > > > Created attachment 38699 [details] > > > Tentative fix. > > > > It successfully passed a full

[Bug bootstrap/71435] [7 regression] sparc bootstrap failure since r235625

2016-06-15 Thread mikpelinux at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71435 --- Comment #10 from Mikael Pettersson --- (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #9) > > Created attachment 38699 [details] > > Tentative fix. > > It successfully passed a full bootstrap/test cycle on SPARC/Solaris. I can test it on

[Bug bootstrap/71435] [7 regression] sparc bootstrap failure since r235625

2016-06-15 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71435 --- Comment #9 from Eric Botcazou --- > Created attachment 38699 [details] > Tentative fix. It successfully passed a full bootstrap/test cycle on SPARC/Solaris.

[Bug bootstrap/71435] [7 regression] sparc bootstrap failure since r235625

2016-06-14 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71435 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug bootstrap/71435] [7 regression] sparc bootstrap failure since r235625

2016-06-14 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71435 --- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou --- > Maybe we need an arg for that function to say whether to look at individual > insn chains? That, or just fiddle with the existing one, its only purpose in the function is to guard the problematic global

[Bug bootstrap/71435] [7 regression] sparc bootstrap failure since r235625

2016-06-14 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71435 --- Comment #6 from Bernd Schmidt --- Not calling finish_spills however could miss cases where pseudos got spilled by update_eliminables_and_spill->spill_hard_reg. Maybe we need an arg for that function to say whether to look at individual insn

[Bug bootstrap/71435] [7 regression] sparc bootstrap failure since r235625

2016-06-14 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71435 --- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou --- I think that calling finish_spills before select_reload_regs is incorrect: static void select_reload_regs (void) { struct insn_chain *chain; /* Try to satisfy the needs for each insn. */ for (chain

[Bug bootstrap/71435] [7 regression] sparc bootstrap failure since r235625

2016-06-09 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71435 --- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou --- > I can (partially) reproduce on Solaris: The problem looks volatile, unrelated switches change code generation.

[Bug bootstrap/71435] [7 regression] sparc bootstrap failure since r235625

2016-06-07 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71435 --- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou --- I can (partially) reproduce on Solaris: Comparing stages 2 and 3 Bootstrap comparison failure! gcc/double-int.o differs make[2]: *** [compare] Error 1

[Bug bootstrap/71435] [7 regression] sparc bootstrap failure since r235625

2016-06-07 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71435 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/71435] [7 regression] sparc bootstrap failure since r235625

2016-06-07 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71435 --- Comment #2 from Bernd Schmidt --- Oops, sorry, wrong bug.

[Bug bootstrap/71435] [7 regression] sparc bootstrap failure since r235625

2016-06-07 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71435 --- Comment #1 from Bernd Schmidt --- Most likely a dup of 71413.

[Bug bootstrap/71435] [7 regression] sparc bootstrap failure since r235625

2016-06-07 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71435 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||sparc-linux CC|