https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81315
Gerald Pfeifer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81315
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
Does this work in say GCC 9? How about the trunk?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81315
--- Comment #6 from Mark Millard ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #5)
> This was BE, on a compiler that defaults to power4 ("970 without altivec").
> I.e. the default for powerpc64-linux.
Good to know. Thanks.
I've no clue what
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81315
--- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool ---
This was BE, on a compiler that defaults to power4 ("970 without altivec").
I.e. the default for powerpc64-linux.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81315
--- Comment #4 from Mark Millard ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #3)
> Builds fine on powerpc64-linux, both trunk and 7.
Could you give information on how to set up
and run this test, including pointing to
what distribution to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81315
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81315
--- Comment #2 from Mark Millard ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1)
> Any chance to reproduce with a cross compiler on Linux?
I assume that amd64 as a host is implicit in this
request.
It is less clear if the target is intended as
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81315
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
