https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87030
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87030
--- Comment #26 from Iain Sandoe ---
Author: iains
Date: Thu Sep 5 19:14:35 2019
New Revision: 275429
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275429=gcc=rev
Log:
[Darwin] Fix PR87030 and tidy config fragments.
This is about 32/64b host and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87030
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.4 |7.5
--- Comment #25 from Iain Sandoe ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87030
--- Comment #24 from Iain Sandoe ---
Author: iains
Date: Thu Aug 29 19:26:45 2019
New Revision: 275052
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275052=gcc=rev
Log:
[Darwin] Fix PR87030 and tidy config fragments.
This is about 32/64b host and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87030
--- Comment #23 from Iain Sandoe ---
fixed on trunk and for 9.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87030
--- Comment #22 from Iain Sandoe ---
Author: iains
Date: Sat Aug 3 20:16:22 2019
New Revision: 274049
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274049=gcc=rev
Log:
Darwin, backport fix for PR87030
273746 , 273749, 273768 [Darwin] Fix PR87030 and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87030
--- Comment #21 from Iain Sandoe ---
Author: iains
Date: Wed Jul 24 19:59:22 2019
New Revision: 273768
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273768=gcc=rev
Log:
[Darwin] Partial reversion of 273749.
We still need to cater for pr80556, for the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87030
--- Comment #20 from Iain Sandoe ---
Author: iains
Date: Tue Jul 23 23:20:31 2019
New Revision: 273749
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273749=gcc=rev
Log:
[Darwin] Fix PR87030 add missed commit hunks.
Messed up the commit, and missed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87030
--- Comment #19 from Iain Sandoe ---
Author: iains
Date: Tue Jul 23 20:31:26 2019
New Revision: 273746
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273746=gcc=rev
Log:
[Darwin] Fix PR87030 and tidy config fragments.
This is about 32/64b host and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87030
--- Comment #18 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #17)
> I have a patch series to fix this - but it's not really appropriate this
> late in stage 4. So plan is to fix in early 10 stage 1 and back port.
It's early 10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87030
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |iains at gcc dot gnu.org
Target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87030
--- Comment #16 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #15)
> FWIW I had a quick look the other day if there was an easy fix to this PR,
> and didn't find a '5 minute' one.
>
> (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #14)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87030
--- Comment #15 from Iain Sandoe ---
FWIW I had a quick look the other day if there was an easy fix to this PR, and
didn't find a '5 minute' one.
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #14)
> (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #13)
> > (In
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87030
--- Comment #14 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #13)
> (In reply to Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia from comment #12)
> > (In reply to Francois-Xavier Coudert from comment #11)
> > > (In reply to Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87030
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87030
--- Comment #12 from Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia
---
(In reply to Francois-Xavier Coudert from comment #11)
> (In reply to Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia from comment #10)
> > Given those, gcc only builds if we have the DevSDK ("headers at /" package)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87030
--- Comment #11 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
(In reply to Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia from comment #10)
> Given those, gcc only builds if we have the DevSDK ("headers at /" package)
> installed.
I may be misunderstanding what you say: GCC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87030
--- Comment #10 from Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia
---
FWIW, I don't have much power other than nagging to move along the OSS drops.
Those are managed by a process, and prioritization is given to those making
explicit requests to the OSS mailing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87030
--- Comment #9 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
On Sat, 8 Sep 2018, iains at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> 2. Actually, you get the same failure on GNU-Linux if you try to configure
> defaults on (for example) an x86_64 system without 32bit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87030
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87030
--- Comment #7 from Jack Howarth ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #6)
> We are not dependent on the Xcode supplied tools for some time now, since
> upstream dsymutil is functional. So, if that were to happen - we would
> simply (as the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87030
--- Comment #6 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Jack Howarth from comment #5)
> (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #3)
>
> >
> > 3. I don't see why GCC should be subject to the vendor's support policy. As
> > far as I am concerned, with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87030
--- Comment #5 from Jack Howarth ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #3)
>
> 3. I don't see why GCC should be subject to the vendor's support policy. As
> far as I am concerned, with the right SDK / sysroot available, there's no
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87030
--- Comment #4 from Jack Howarth ---
A couple notes here.
1) As I mentioned in the duplicate PR 87257, Apple achieved the obsoleting of
the i386 support in Xcode 10 through the libSystem.tbd in the 10.14 SDK's
buried /usr/lib/libSystem.tbd
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87030
--- Comment #3 from Iain Sandoe ---
Just a few notes:
1. I'm not objecting to some kind of automation to switch off the 32b multiline
where the *target* system is >= 10.14/Darwin18 (someone needs to write it,
that's all).
2. Actually, you get
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87030
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||howarth.at.gcc at gmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87030
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
27 matches
Mail list logo
