[Bug bootstrap/91208] [10 Regression] bootstrap comparison failure for objc and obj-c++

[doko at debian dot org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91208

Matthias Klose  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

--- Comment #4 from Matthias Klose  ---
I'm wrong, this is a duplicate of PR91209.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 91209 ***

[Bug bootstrap/91208] [10 Regression] bootstrap comparison failure for objc and obj-c++

[jakub at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91208

--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek  ---
cc1*checksum.o warning appears normally (though I wonder why, e.g. for
cc1-checksum.o etc. it is not printed, just for ObjC/ObjC++), what is more
interesting is what is printed after the comparison failure message (i.e.
content of .bad_compare) and what the differences are.

[Bug bootstrap/91208] [10 Regression] bootstrap comparison failure for objc and obj-c++

[jakub at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91208

Jakub Jelinek  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek  ---
Strange, I've bootstrapped r273585 with objc as well as obj-c++ just fine last
night.
--enable-languages=default,ada,obj-c++,lto,go,brig,d \
--enable-checking=yes,rtl,extra

[Bug bootstrap/91208] [10 Regression] bootstrap comparison failure for objc and obj-c++

[doko at debian dot org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91208

--- Comment #1 from Matthias Klose  ---
my last successful bootstrap is from 20190706, r273162

[Bug bootstrap/91208] [10 Regression] bootstrap comparison failure for objc and obj-c++

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91208

Richard Biener  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Target||x86-64-linux
  Component|objc|bootstrap
   Target Milestone|--- |10.0