[Bug c++/100809] PPC: __int128 divide/modulo does not use P10 instructions vdivsq/vdivuq

[meissner at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100809

Michael Meissner  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org  |meissner at gcc dot 
gnu.org
 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

--- Comment #5 from Michael Meissner  ---
Patch submitted:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-June/571942.html

[Bug c++/100809] PPC: __int128 divide/modulo does not use P10 instructions vdivsq/vdivuq

[meissner at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100809

--- Comment #4 from Michael Meissner  ---
Note, in looking at Carl's patch, it is only for adding the built-ins.  I don't
believe it adds direct support for {,u}divti3 and {,u}moddti3 to implement
these for normal __int128 variables.

[Bug c++/100809] PPC: __int128 divide/modulo does not use P10 instructions vdivsq/vdivuq

[meissner at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100809

Michael Meissner  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Last reconfirmed||2021-06-01
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
 CC||carll at gcc dot gnu.org,
   ||meissner at gcc dot gnu.org
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #3 from Michael Meissner  ---
Carl Love submitted a patch for this on April 26th.

[Bug c++/100809] PPC: __int128 divide/modulo does not use P10 instructions vdivsq/vdivuq

[wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100809

--- Comment #2 from Bill Schmidt  ---
I believe this work is pending, but the patches are still under review.

[Bug c++/100809] PPC: __int128 divide/modulo does not use P10 instructions vdivsq/vdivuq

[jens.seifert at de dot ibm.com via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100809

--- Comment #1 from Jens Seifert  ---
Same applies to modulo.