[Bug c++/103375] [12 regression] -Werror=uninitialized false positive on unittest-cpp since r12-5391-g0790c8aacdfb4f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103375 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|NEW |RESOLVED --- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek --- The reduced test no longer warns. The unreduced warns, but that seems to be a good thing, just switch the order of these: 23480 TestRunner runner; 23481 RecordingReporter reporter; Not a bug, IMHO.
[Bug c++/103375] [12 regression] -Werror=uninitialized false positive on unittest-cpp since r12-5391-g0790c8aacdfb4f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103375 --- Comment #3 from Sergei Trofimovich --- Proposed upstream workaround as https://github.com/unittest-cpp/unittest-cpp/pull/185.
[Bug c++/103375] [12 regression] -Werror=uninitialized false positive on unittest-cpp since r12-5391-g0790c8aacdfb4f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103375 --- Comment #2 from Sergei Trofimovich --- Created attachment 51855 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51855=edit a.cpp.cpp Also attaching unmodified preprocessed original file as I might have removed too much. Original example uses inheritance with virtual functions. gcc complains as: $ g++-12.0.0 -std=c++14 -Werror=uninitialized -c a.cpp.cpp a.cpp.cpp: In constructor '{anonymous}::FixtureBase::FixtureBase()': a.cpp.cpp:23467:19: error: member '{anonymous}::FixtureBase::reporter' is used uninitialized [-Werror=uninitialized] 23467 | : runner(reporter) | ^~~~ cc1plus: some warnings being treated as errors
[Bug c++/103375] [12 regression] -Werror=uninitialized false positive on unittest-cpp since r12-5391-g0790c8aacdfb4f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103375 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-11-23 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Confirmed. If you swap the order of runner and reporter you don't get the uninitialized warning. I do have to wonder if the warning should be improved in messaging here because it is not obvious why this might be bad. In this case maybe used before is initialized due to order of the variables or something to that effect.
[Bug c++/103375] [12 regression] -Werror=uninitialized false positive on unittest-cpp since r12-5391-g0790c8aacdfb4f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103375 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0 CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org