https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104055
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104055
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1c3c885e1bba86f01917445928006d26062c5b15
commit r10-10668-g1c3c885e1bba86f01917445928006d26062c5b15
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104055
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:91ac88cada3960517415bc92ae6d2d13a5e779a0
commit r11-9502-g91ac88cada3960517415bc92ae6d2d13a5e779a0
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104055
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1a5145f1e3adf8b2ba4ad416a5ddef59a1e34d48
commit r12-6705-g1a5145f1e3adf8b2ba4ad416a5ddef59a1e34d48
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104055
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104055
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> Now, I think the initializer shouldn't be
> refering to the slot decl (e.g. take its address), because that wouldn't be
> a constant expression.
Note that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104055
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Because of the consteval build_over_call will do:
9920 if (obj_arg && is_dummy_object (obj_arg))
9921{
9922 call = build_cplus_new (DECL_CONTEXT (fndecl), call,
