[Bug c++/106024] [11/12/13 Regression] ICE on missing template keyword in template method call in pack expansion
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106024 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||johelegp at gmail dot com --- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski --- *** Bug 102931 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
[Bug c++/106024] [11/12/13 Regression] ICE on missing template keyword in template method call in pack expansion
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106024 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amir.ahmed.ansari at outlook dot c ||om --- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski --- *** Bug 106351 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
[Bug c++/106024] [11/12/13 Regression] ICE on missing template keyword in template method call in pack expansion
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106024 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:656c0212909bc91b1025aa12774d981adb531b4c commit r13-1516-g656c0212909bc91b1025aa12774d981adb531b4c Author: Jason Merrill Date: Tue Jul 5 17:05:47 2022 -0400 c++: dependent conversion operator lookup [PR106179] This testcase demonstrates that my assumption that we would only be interested in a class template lookup if the template-id is followed by :: was wrong. PR c++/106179 PR c++/106024 gcc/cp/ChangeLog: * parser.cc (cp_parser_lookup_name): Remove :: requirement for using unqualified lookup result. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * g++.dg/template/operator16.C: New test.
[Bug c++/106024] [11/12/13 Regression] ICE on missing template keyword in template method call in pack expansion
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106024 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill --- Fixed for 11.4/12.2/13.
[Bug c++/106024] [11/12/13 Regression] ICE on missing template keyword in template method call in pack expansion
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106024 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:252e9dfee9b1d01e0e44773ad83e0e44f3650945 commit r11-10100-g252e9dfee9b1d01e0e44773ad83e0e44f3650945 Author: Jason Merrill Date: Thu Jun 23 23:14:35 2022 -0400 c++: dependent generic lambda template-id [PR106024] We were wrongly looking up the generic lambda op() in a dependent scope, and then trying to look up its instantiation at substitution time, but lambdas aren't instantiated, so we crashed. The fix is to not look into dependent lambda scopes. PR c++/106024 gcc/cp/ChangeLog: * parser.c (cp_parser_lookup_name): Don't look in dependent lambda. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * g++.dg/cpp2a/lambda-generic10.C: New test.
[Bug c++/106024] [11/12/13 Regression] ICE on missing template keyword in template method call in pack expansion
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106024 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e748398b3ef6412ef35b85ef6b0893809aeb49cd commit r12-8537-ge748398b3ef6412ef35b85ef6b0893809aeb49cd Author: Jason Merrill Date: Fri Jul 1 11:02:54 2022 -0400 c++: simpler fix for PR106024 Actually, for release branches let's just avoid the lookup for the lambdas that are the problematic case and only make the bigger change on trunk. PR c++/106024 gcc/cp/ChangeLog: * parser.cc (cp_parser_lookup_name): Limit previous change to lambdas.
[Bug c++/106024] [11/12/13 Regression] ICE on missing template keyword in template method call in pack expansion
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106024 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c17206709f94331e81443e2bdcf135a6ab7428ce commit r12-8533-gc17206709f94331e81443e2bdcf135a6ab7428ce Author: Jason Merrill Date: Thu Jun 23 23:14:35 2022 -0400 c++: dependent generic lambda template-id [PR106024] We were wrongly looking up the generic lambda op() in a dependent scope, and then trying to look up its instantiation at substitution time, but lambdas aren't instantiated, so we crashed. The fix is to not look into dependent class scopes. But this created trouble with wrongly trying to use a template from the enclosing scope when we aren't actually looking at a template-argument-list, in template/lookup18.C, so let's avoid that. PR c++/106024 gcc/cp/ChangeLog: * parser.cc (missing_template_diag): Factor out... (cp_parser_id_expression): ...from here. (cp_parser_lookup_name): Don't look in dependent object_type. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * g++.dg/cpp2a/lambda-generic10.C: New test.
[Bug c++/106024] [11/12/13 Regression] ICE on missing template keyword in template method call in pack expansion
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106024 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:07ac550393d00fcadcee21b44abee6bb30c93949 commit r13-1390-g07ac550393d00fcadcee21b44abee6bb30c93949 Author: Jason Merrill Date: Thu Jun 23 23:14:35 2022 -0400 c++: dependent generic lambda template-id [PR106024] We were wrongly looking up the generic lambda op() in a dependent scope, and then trying to look up its instantiation at substitution time, but lambdas aren't instantiated, so we crashed. The fix is to not look into dependent class scopes. But this created trouble with wrongly trying to use a template from the enclosing scope when we aren't actually looking at a template-argument-list, in template/lookup18.C, so let's avoid that. PR c++/106024 gcc/cp/ChangeLog: * parser.cc (missing_template_diag): Factor out... (cp_parser_id_expression): ...from here. (cp_parser_lookup_name): Don't look in dependent object_type. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * g++.dg/cpp2a/lambda-generic10.C: New test.
[Bug c++/106024] [11/12/13 Regression] ICE on missing template keyword in template method call in pack expansion
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106024
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
Testcase with only one lambda:
template void sink(Ts &&...);
template void f()
{
sink ([] (auto...) { return 1; }
.operator()(args...)...);
}
int main()
{
f<1,2,3>();
}
[Bug c++/106024] [11/12/13 Regression] ICE on missing template keyword in template method call in pack expansion
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106024 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||10.3.0 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Summary|ICE on missing template |[11/12/13 Regression] ICE |keyword in template method |on missing template keyword |call in pack expansion |in template method call in ||pack expansion Last reconfirmed||2022-06-20 Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Confirmed, a regression from 10.x.
[Bug c++/106024] [11/12/13 Regression] ICE on missing template keyword in template method call in pack expansion
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106024 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|ICE on missing template |[11/12/13 Regression] ICE |keyword in template method |on missing template keyword |call in pack expansion |in template method call in ||pack expansion Target Milestone|--- |11.4 Known to work||10.3.0 Known to fail||11.1.0
