[Bug c++/109480] [11/12/13 Regression] non-depedent access goes wrong in a template method sometimes since r11-1350-g92bed036098928
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109480 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|11.4|11.5 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 11.4 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 11.5.
[Bug c++/109480] [11/12/13 Regression] non-depedent access goes wrong in a template method sometimes since r11-1350-g92bed036098928
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109480 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[11/12/13/14 Regression]|[11/12/13 Regression] |non-depedent access goes|non-depedent access goes |wrong in a template method |wrong in a template method |sometimes since |sometimes since |r11-1350-g92bed036098928|r11-1350-g92bed036098928 --- Comment #6 from Patrick Palka --- Fixed on trunk so far.
[Bug c++/109480] [11/12/13 Regression] non-depedent access goes wrong in a template method sometimes since r11-1350-g92bed036098928
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109480 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
[Bug c++/109480] [11/12/13 Regression] non-depedent access goes wrong in a template method sometimes since r11-1350-g92bed036098928
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109480 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2
[Bug c++/109480] [11/12/13 Regression] non-depedent access goes wrong in a template method sometimes since r11-1350-g92bed036098928
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109480 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org, ||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed||2023-04-12 Summary|[11/12/13 Regression] |[11/12/13 Regression] |non-depedent access goes|non-depedent access goes |wrong in a template method |wrong in a template method |sometimes |sometimes since ||r11-1350-g92bed036098928 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2) > Most likely this was caused by r11-1350 . Yes.