https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112765
Bug ID: 112765
Summary: [14 regression] -Wparentheses warning even when extra
parens are present
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: s...@li-snyder.org
Target Milestone: ---
hi -
With a recent checkout of gcc14 (20231129), on a x86_64-pc-linux-gnu host,
the following source gives a bogus -Wparentheses warning
with -Wall:
--------------------------------------------------------------
struct ptr
{
ptr& operator= (ptr&& __u);
explicit operator bool() const;
};
ptr getShare ();
template<class T>
class AnaToolHandle final
{
public:
int getMode (ptr& sharedTool) const;
};
template<class T>
int AnaToolHandle<T>::getMode (ptr& sharedTool) const
{
if ((sharedTool = getShare ()))
return 0;
return 1;
}
void initialize(AnaToolHandle<int>& jetCleaningTool)
{
ptr sharedTool;
jetCleaningTool.getMode (sharedTool);
}
--------------------------------------------------------------
$ g++ -c -Wall x.cc
x.cc: In instantiation of ‘int AnaToolHandle<T>::getMode(ptr&) const [with T =
int]’:
x.cc:28:27: required from here
28 | jetCleaningTool.getMode (sharedTool);
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~
x.cc:19:31: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value
[-Wparentheses]
19 | if ((sharedTool = getShare ()))
| ^
It is true that there is an assignment used as a truth value, and in the
original code this was intentional, which the author signalled by adding
an extra pair of parentheses. However, gcc emits the warning even though
the extra parentheses are there. (Adding yet another pair of parentheses
around the condition does not silence the warning.)
This warning does not occcur with gcc 13.2.1 20230728.
