--- Comment #22 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-20 22:13 ---
Subject: Bug 13358
Author: manu
Date: Mon Apr 20 22:12:52 2009
New Revision: 146459
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=146459
Log:
2009-04-21 Manuel Lopez-Ibanez m...@gcc.gnu.org
PR
--- Comment #23 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-20 22:18 ---
FIXED in GCC 4.5.
+Warn if @samp{long long} type is used. This is enabled by either
+...@option{-pedantic} or @option{-Wtraditional} in ISO C90 and C++98
+modes. To inhibit the warning messages, use
--- Comment #21 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-07 20:23 ---
There is a patch here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-10/msg00970.html
--
manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #18 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-23 11:31 ---
I cannot reproduce the warning in C or C++. It seems this got fixed silently.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13358
--- Comment #19 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-23 12:26 ---
OK, sorry, I needed -m32 in the command line to reproduce it. Is there a
consensus here? It seems too pedantic to warn for something that GCC can handle
perfectly well.
--
--- Comment #20 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-23 12:37 ---
*** Bug 33736 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13358
--- Comment #17 from lloyd at randombit dot net 2007-08-27 13:14 ---
This should probably be reexamined with regards to C++0x, since it includes
'long long' and my reading of the working group draft is that a constant too
large to fit into a long should be considered a long long or
