--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2005-08-10
13:52 ---
Please read:
http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.4/changes.html
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-10
13:53 ---
Please read: http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.4/changes.html:
When binding an rvalue of class type to a reference, the copy constructor of
the class must be
accessible. For instance, consider the following code:
--- Additional Comments From christian dot engstrom at glindra dot se
2005-08-10 14:41 ---
Subject: Re: Unused copy constructor can't be private
giovannibajo at libero dot it wrote:
Please read:
http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.4/changes.html
Quite right. That was indeed a surprising
