--- Comment #3 from jbuck at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-12 08:18 ---
Andrew is right, this isn't a bug, and is in fact required by the ABI.
See http://www.codesourcery.com/cxx-abi/abi.html#class-types, section II,
subsection 3. "First, attempt to place D at offset 0." No rule prevents
--- Comment #2 from bangerth at dealii dot org 2006-10-12 00:56 ---
Why exactly do you think that the empty base should not be located at
the same address as the simple_base base object?
W.
--
bangerth at dealii dot org changed:
What|Removed |Adde
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-30
20:21 ---
Someone will have to look this up in the ABI since this is an ABI issue.
But I think is okay as the base class is empty and takes no space at all.
--
What|Removed |Added
