https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25814
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25814
--- Comment #19 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5b2003105b35f8fe8e074c055a718c8f484d9d32
commit r11-4756-g5b2003105b35f8fe8e074c055a718c8f484d9d32
Author: Marek Polacek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25814
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25814
--- Comment #17 from Marek Polacek ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #16)
> (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #15)
> > David, presumably you're not working on this at the moment?
> You're correct. Sorry about that. Switching
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25814
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org|unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25814
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25814
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|9.3 |9.4
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25814
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|9.2 |9.3
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25814
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|9.0 |9.2
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25814
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Blocks|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25814
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25814
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nightstrike at gmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25814
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xinliangli at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25814
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25814
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2006-03-08 05:07:27 |2016-8-12
CC|
--- Comment #6 from Raimund dot Merkert at baesystems dot com 2006-11-14
15:52 ---
It does not seem to warn about unused functions. I also tried the following
test case where 4.0.0 (solaris) does not warn even about foo ( I guess because
it's referenced in Y's constructor?)
gcc
--- Comment #5 from wolfgang dot roemer at gmx dot net 2006-11-14 15:35
---
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Usually the problem will get caught as soon as you try to invoke a method, but
if it's something like a guard object, without methods, then it can be a
problem.
At least in this case
--- Comment #4 from bangerth at dealii dot org 2006-03-08 05:07 ---
I think we can confirm the problem. I doubt anyone will come around to
actually taking this on anytime soon, though...
W.
--
bangerth at dealii dot org changed:
What|Removed
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25814
--- Comment #3 from Raimund dot Merkert at baesystems dot com 2006-01-17
12:32 ---
I would not consider myself a beginner, but I'm no c++ language laywer either.
Usually the problem will get caught as soon as you try to invoke a method, but
if it's something like a guard object,
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-17 00:58 ---
Maybe if more C++ books actually talked about this issue, there would not be a
problem (sorry I could not resists). Also warning about very valid and defined
code even if it is a common mistake that beginers make.
--- Comment #2 from gdr at cs dot tamu dot edu 2006-01-17 04:01 ---
Subject: Re: Request for warning for parser ambiguity of function declarations
and variable declarations with initializations
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Maybe if more C++ books
22 matches
Mail list logo
