--- Comment #11 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-28 20:19
---
Shouldn't this be closed as fixed?
No, because the fix was reverted the bug remains unfixed.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26693
--- Comment #10 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-03-24
13:55 ---
Shouldn't this be closed as fixed?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26693
--- Comment #8 from dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-21 16:15 ---
Subject: Bug 26693
Author: dodji
Date: Wed Jan 21 16:14:49 2009
New Revision: 143546
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=143546
Log:
gcc/ChangeLog:
2009-01-21 Dodji Seketeli do...@redhat.com
--- Comment #9 from dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-22 07:15 ---
Subject: Bug 26693
Author: dodji
Date: Thu Jan 22 07:15:41 2009
New Revision: 143562
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=143562
Log:
Reverted commit 143546 related to PR c++/26693
Removed:
--- Comment #7 from dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-01 14:29 ---
I posted a patch to http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-10/msg01278.html.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26693
--- Comment #6 from dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-29 21:56 ---
I think the problem is due to the fact that in general, grokdeclarator() in
gcc/cp/decl.c does not properly set the type variant node for typedef
statements.
To understand this way of representing the relationship
--
dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #5 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-08-21 11:58
---
*** Bug 36734 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-04 20:21 ---
Closing 4.1 branch.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
