--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-15 00:44 ---
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #3 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-14 00:43 ---
Subject: Bug 31074
Author: jason
Date: Sat Apr 14 00:43:18 2007
New Revision: 123805
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=123805
Log:
PR c++/31074
* call.c (reference_binding): Add
--- Comment #4 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-14 02:27 ---
Subject: Bug 31074
Author: jason
Date: Sat Apr 14 02:27:02 2007
New Revision: 123807
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=123807
Log:
PR c++/31074
* call.c (reference_binding): Add
--- Comment #5 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-14 02:29 ---
Subject: Bug 31074
Author: jason
Date: Sat Apr 14 02:29:29 2007
New Revision: 123808
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=123808
Log:
PR c++/31074
* call.c (reference_binding): Add
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31074
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-08 02:06 ---
Confirmed, related to PR 22132. The difference between this and that PR is
this one has references while that one was only pointers.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-08 02:09 ---
Oh and PR 22132 was already fixed :).
And the reason why the patch for PR 22132 did not fix this bug is because
comp_ptr_ttypes_const does not take into account REFERENCE_TYPEs.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
