--- Comment #6 from dgregor at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-31 13:41 ---
Subject: Bug 31138
Author: dgregor
Date: Sat Mar 31 13:41:30 2007
New Revision: 123380
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=123380
Log:
2007-03-31 Douglas Gregor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #7 from dgregor at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-31 13:43 ---
Fixed in mainline compiler
--
dgregor at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
dgregor at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |dgregor at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org
--- Comment #4 from doug dot gregor at gmail dot com 2007-03-27 15:12
---
Patch here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-03/msg00799.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31138
--- Comment #5 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-27 15:18 ---
*** Bug 31372 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.3.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31138
--- Comment #1 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-11 23:01
---
I guess this is also related to your patch for variadic templates, Douglas,
but I might be wrong:
2007-03-09 Douglas Gregor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR c++/20599
* typeck.c (check_return_expr): Check
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-11 23:19 ---
How is the first one valid? I thought you always needed a comma before the
ellipsis for variable argument functions (I know in C you need it for sure).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31138
--- Comment #3 from schwab at suse dot de 2007-03-11 23:51 ---
In C++ the comma before ... is optional.
Where syntactically correct, #8220;, ...#8221; is synonymous with
#8220;...#8221;.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31138
