[Bug c++/31488] [4.3/4.4 Regression] va_list considered non-POD

2009-01-15 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #14 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-15 22:34 --- Subject: Bug 31488 Author: jason Date: Thu Jan 15 22:34:20 2009 New Revision: 143413 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=143413 Log: PR c++/36334 PR c++/37646 * tree.c

[Bug c++/31488] [4.3/4.4 Regression] va_list considered non-POD

2009-01-15 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #15 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-15 22:54 --- Fixed. -- jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/31488] [4.3/4.4 Regression] va_list considered non-POD

2009-01-12 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #13 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-12 21:07 --- Subject: Bug 31488 Author: jason Date: Mon Jan 12 21:07:46 2009 New Revision: 143308 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=143308 Log: PR c++/31488 * tree.c (pod_type_p): Return 1 for

[Bug c++/31488] [4.3/4.4 Regression] va_list considered non-POD

2009-01-07 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #11 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-07 20:59 --- Created an attachment (id=17051) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17051action=view) Fix in pod_type_p Uros is testing this patch for me. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31488

[Bug c++/31488] [4.3/4.4 Regression] va_list considered non-POD

2009-01-07 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
--- Comment #12 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2009-01-08 07:04 --- (In reply to comment #11) Created an attachment (id=17051) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17051action=view) [edit] Fix in pod_type_p Uros is testing this patch for me. This patch bootstraps OK

[Bug c++/31488] [4.3/4.4 Regression] va_list considered non-POD

2009-01-05 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu dot org AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot

[Bug c++/31488] [4.3/4.4 Regression] va_list considered non-POD

2008-12-31 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
--- Comment #10 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2008-12-31 17:02 --- Marking as a regression, testsuite failures are always regressions. -- ubizjak at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/31488] [4.3/4.4 Regression] va_list considered non-POD

2008-12-31 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31488