http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37773
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37773
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-25
10:08:42 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
(In reply to comment #3)
Works as desigened. Really ;)
So what is the point of -fmax-errors=N ?
Eh? Surely -fmax-errors *is*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37773
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||navin.kumar at
--- Comment #1 from carlo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-08 16:48 ---
Here's another one:
../cwchessboard/PgnDatabase.cc:65: error: no matching function for call to
âutil::MemoryBlockList::append(gssize)â
../cwchessboard/MemoryBlockList.h:232: note: candidates are: void
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 8, 2008, at 9:48 AM, carlo at gcc dot gnu dot org [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- Comment #1 from carlo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-08
16:48 ---
Here's another one:
This expected behaviour of this option. It was not designed for users
really to
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2008-10-08 16:57 ---
Subject: Re: -Wfatal-errors aborts too early
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 8, 2008, at 9:48 AM, carlo at gcc dot gnu dot org
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- Comment #1 from carlo at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-08 20:00 ---
Works as desigened. Really ;)
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
