https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39159
--- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor ---
I'm not an expert in this area but the approach seems reasonable to me. I
didn't test it in 5.x but with 6.0, it doesn't make a difference because
simple_cst_equal() cannot compare TREE_LISTs. Using
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39159
--- Comment #6 from Gert ---
I forgot to mention: the patch is against 5.3.0.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39159
Gert changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gw.fossdev at gmail dot com
--- Comment #5 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39159
wipedout at yandex dot ru changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wipedout at yandex dot ru
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39159
Jesper Juhl jj at chaosbits dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jj at chaosbits dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39159
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
--- Comment #1 from sebor at roguewave dot com 2009-02-12 17:02 ---
In addition, as the test case below shows, the warning is issued inconsistently
between classes and functions, suggesting that the instance of the warning on
the class declaration on line 2 might be a bug rather than a
