http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49118
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||basil at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49118
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49118
--- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-10
05:18:40 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jun 10 05:18:36 2011
New Revision: 174889
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=174889
Log:
PR c++/49118
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49118
--- Comment #9 from David Krauss potswa at mac dot com 2011-06-10 05:25:08
UTC ---
Thanks!
On Jun 9, 2011, at 10:18 PM, jason at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49118
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49118
--- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-05-26
09:41:10 UTC ---
Maybe Jason can give you some tips, better sending the patch to the mailing
list for that, though, Bugzilla isn't meant for patches. CC Jason.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49118
--- Comment #7 from David Krauss potswa at mac dot com 2011-05-26 11:05:12
UTC ---
Yes, I'll likely do that in a few days… just wanted to put the code in safe
holding, just in case.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49118
--- Comment #4 from David Krauss potswa at mac dot com 2011-05-26 03:37:44
UTC ---
Created attachment 24359
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24359
Patch fixes behavior but error message repeats twice.
I implemented the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49118
David Krauss potswa at mac dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #24359|0 |1
is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49118
--- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-05-23
07:44:01 UTC ---
For the record, ICC (EDG that is) misbehaves the same way, at least the
versions to which I have access. Maybe clang does something different?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49118
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-23
08:22:00 UTC ---
nope, same behaviour for clang 2.8
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49118
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
11 matches
Mail list logo