http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51196
--- Comment #6 from Greta Yorsh Greta.Yorsh at arm dot com 2011-11-22
10:56:41 UTC ---
Thanks for fixing it, Paolo. Tested as follows.
Successful cross-build of the patch version for arm-none-eabi target,
configured as before. No regression on
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51196
--- Comment #7 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-11-22 15:04:33 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Tue Nov 22 15:04:27 2011
New Revision: 181620
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=181620
Log:
2011-11-22 Paolo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51196
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51196
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|Greta.Yorsh at arm dot com |
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51196
--- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-11-21
17:04:47 UTC ---
Created attachment 25873
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25873
Sanity checked on x86_64-linux and lightly tested arm-none-eabi
In
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51196
--- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-11-17
17:33:43 UTC ---
That's a pity, but personally frankly I don't think I will be able to seriously
debug for this target in the near future. Or maybe Jason has something
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51196
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51196
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-11-17
18:14:16 UTC ---
I'll see what I can do... At the moment really I have no idea why for this
target only we have a different behavior.
