[Bug c++/51317] [C++0x] [DR 587] Wrong value category of conditional expression where lvalue operands differ only in cv-qualification

2021-07-28 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51317 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.0 Resolution|---

[Bug c++/51317] [C++0x] [DR 587] Wrong value category of conditional expression where lvalue operands differ only in cv-qualification

2014-10-02 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51317 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||eric.niebler at

[Bug c++/51317] [C++0x] [DR 587] Wrong value category of conditional expression where lvalue operands differ only in cv-qualification

2014-10-02 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51317 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||james.kanze at

[Bug c++/51317] [C++0x] [DR 587] Wrong value category of conditional expression where lvalue operands differ only in cv-qualification

2014-05-09 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51317 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jason Date: Fri May 9 18:16:18 2014 New Revision: 210285 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210285root=gccview=rev Log: DR 587 PR c++/51317 * call.c

[Bug c++/51317] [C++0x] [DR 587] Wrong value category of conditional expression where lvalue operands differ only in cv-qualification

2014-05-09 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51317 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug c++/51317] [C++0x] [DR 587] Wrong value category of conditional expression where lvalue operands differ only in cv-qualification

2012-09-10 Thread tsoae at mail dot ru
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51317 Nikolka tsoae at mail dot ru changed: What|Removed |Added Version|4.7.0 |4.8.0 --- Comment #1 from