http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51420
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-07
15:41:08 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Dec 7 15:41:03 2011
New Revision: 182083
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182083
Log:
PR c++/51420
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51420
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51420
--- Comment #1 from Ed Smith-Rowland 3dw4rd at verizon dot net 2011-12-06
04:45:09 UTC ---
Created attachment 25999
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25999
Check that the return of OVL_NEXT is a function_type.
Check that the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51420
--- Comment #2 from Ed Smith-Rowland 3dw4rd at verizon dot net 2011-12-06
05:36:03 UTC ---
Created attachment 26000
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26000
Try that again.
Last patch broke several test cases.
This one works.
