http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52008
Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52008
--- Comment #10 from Michal Malecki ethouris at gmail dot com 2012-04-23
12:38:47 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
(In reply to comment #8)
2. The code is rejected the following way: the template specialization
definition is itself rejected
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52008
--- Comment #8 from Michal Malecki ethouris at gmail dot com 2012-04-21
12:06:36 UTC ---
Jason,
There is no better or worse specialization - the first one is a primary
template, not a specialization.
The example of tuple_slice1, int, int, int
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52008
--- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-21
13:06:10 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
There is no better or worse specialization - the first one is a primary
template, not a specialization.
But if it were another
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52008
Michal Malecki ethouris at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52008
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|SUSPENDED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52008
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-21
01:46:29 UTC ---
If you rewrite the test so that the two versions are both partial
specializations:
template size_t, typename... struct tuple_sliced;
template size_t B,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52008
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52008
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52008
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-17
02:29:47 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Apr 17 02:29:43 2012
New Revision: 186521
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=186521
Log:
PR c++/52008
* pt.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52008
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
11 matches
Mail list logo