http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52465
--- Comment #8 from fabien at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-15 20:22:47 UTC ---
Author: fabien
Date: Sun Apr 15 20:22:44 2012
New Revision: 186473
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=186473
Log:
2012-04-15 Fabien ChĂȘne
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52465
fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52465
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52465
fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |fabien at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52465
fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #3 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52465
--- Comment #4 from fabien at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-04 21:52:15 UTC ---
This is because some USING_DECLs are stored in IDENTIDIER_BINDINGs. Jason, do
you agree that cxx_binding-value and cxx_binding-type should not be
USING_DECLs ?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52465
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid