https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55425
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55425
--- Comment #9 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Wed Nov 19 17:40:42 2014
New Revision: 217788
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217788&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2014-11-19 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/55425
* constex
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55425
--- Comment #8 from Paolo Carlini ---
Uhm, in fact probably it should be accepted with -std=c++11 too, let's wait a
second.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55425
--- Comment #7 from Paolo Carlini ---
I think we can close this. The __func__ snippet now works in mainline with
-std=c++14, I'm adding it to the testsuite.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55425
Richard Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||richard-gccbugzilla@metafoo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55425
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55425
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55425
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-11-21
12:40:29 UTC ---
1) is not valid constexpr IMHO, as the standard says that __func__ works as if
static const char __func__[] = "function-name";
has been provided, but when it is provided,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55425
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-11-21
12:19:06 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> > Situation 3: __m128i type
> > --
> >
> > Assigning a literal value to a constexpr __m128 fails because the literal is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55425
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-11-21
12:12:19 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
>
> A return statement is not a return statement if the returned value is __func__
> (also true for non-standard identifiers like __PRETTY_FUNCTION_
10 matches
Mail list logo
